<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252" ?><rss version="2.0">    <channel>        <title>GSDRC newsfeed on Voice and accountability</title>        <link>http://www.gsdrc.org</link>        <description>Academic and policy-relevant publications on governance and international development.</description>        <language>en-uk</language>        <copyright>Copyright &#169; 2010 Governance and Social Development Resource Centre</copyright>        <pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 18:00:13 GMT</pubDate>        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 18:00:13 GMT</lastBuildDate>        <docs>http://www.gsdrc.org/rss/open</docs>        <managingEditor>george@gsdrc.org</managingEditor>        <webMaster>george@gsdrc.org</webMaster>                <item>            <title>Applying a Rights-based Approach: An Inspirational Guide for Civil Society</title>            <author>Jakob Kirkemann Boesen and Tomas Martin</author>            <description>With its focus on law and the root causes of poverty, the rights-based approach (RBA) releases a new transformative potential for development. This guide provides practical methods for the integration of the RBA into programmes implemented by smaller civil society organisations (CSOs) in poor countries. While it is not a panacea, the RBA has the potential to bring people whose rights are denied by poverty to the centre of development analyses and implementation.</description>            <link>http://www.gsdrc.org/go/display&amp;type=Document&amp;id=3780&amp;source=rss</link>            <guid>http://www.gsdrc.org/go/display&amp;type=Document&amp;id=3780&amp;source=rss</guid>            <category>Voice and accountability</category>            <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>        </item>        <item>            <title>Introduction: Negotiating Empowerment</title>            <author>Andrea Cornwall and Jenny Edwards</author>            <description>Why are conventional interventions that seek to promote women’s empowerment insufficient? This article highlights the choices, negotiations, narratives, and context of women’s lived experience. It finds that empowerment is a complex process of negotiation rather than a linear sequence of inputs and outcomes. Governments and development agencies need to give more consideration to the structures perpetuating gender inequality. They should invest in creating an enabling environment for women’s empowerment, and should support those who are tackling deeply rooted issues of power impeding transformative change.</description>            <link>http://www.gsdrc.org/go/display&amp;type=Document&amp;id=3773&amp;source=rss</link>            <guid>http://www.gsdrc.org/go/display&amp;type=Document&amp;id=3773&amp;source=rss</guid>            <category>Voice and accountability</category>            <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>        </item>        <item>            <title>&apos;The Grass of the Rich?&apos; Integrity and Post-war Reconstruction in the Tonkolili District, Sierra Leone</title>            <author>E. Broadbent and A. Kamara</author>            <description>How can corruption and lack of transparency and accountability be addressed in reconstruction projects? These problems have severely constrained the rebuilding of Sierra Leone’s infrastructure, but neither the channels nor the incentives exist for community members to challenge such practices. This report reviews a Community Oversight Monitoring project (2008-2009), which identified delays in project completion, sub-standard work; and widespread theft of materials. Underlying contributing factors are patronage politics, institutional weakness and a lack of political will to investigate, redress and prevent such problems. Lack of civil society participation, oversight, awareness and consultation entrenches and is perpetuated by these political and institutional factors.</description>            <link>http://www.gsdrc.org/go/display&amp;type=Document&amp;id=3772&amp;source=rss</link>            <guid>http://www.gsdrc.org/go/display&amp;type=Document&amp;id=3772&amp;source=rss</guid>            <category>Voice and accountability</category>            <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>        </item>        <item>            <title>Better Information, Better Aid</title>            <author>aidinfo</author>            <description>What are the potential benefits of aid transparency? What information is needed and how could donors make this more accessible? Survey results indicate that improved transparency of aid information would contribute to faster poverty reduction by making aid more effective and accountable. Users of aid information need more accessible, detailed, timely, and consistent information to enable them to make aid work better. Donors should therefore publish information (electronically) in more detail, using common definitions and a common format. This could both reduce costs for donors, who repeatedly provide the same information in different forms, and increase the information&apos;s value to users.</description>            <link>http://www.gsdrc.org/go/display&amp;type=Document&amp;id=3771&amp;source=rss</link>            <guid>http://www.gsdrc.org/go/display&amp;type=Document&amp;id=3771&amp;source=rss</guid>            <category>Voice and accountability</category>            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>        </item>        <item>            <title>Measuring Change and Results in Voice and Accountability Work</title>            <author>Jeremy Holland and Allyson Thirkell</author>            <description>How can the often intangible results of Voice and Accountability (V&amp;A) interventions be measured? This paper adapts DFID’s &apos;Capability, Accountability and Responsiveness&apos; (CAR) governance framework for use with V&amp;A work. It maps existing indicators onto this adapted framework, developing a menu of V&amp;A indicators and data collection instruments. Measures need to take account of the costs as well as benefits of poor people&apos;s voices being heard, and should reveal the obstacles to poor people&apos;s engagement. V&amp;A indicator data can effectively combine observable and measurable changes in behaviour with perception scoring of the quality of those changes.</description>            <link>http://www.gsdrc.org/go/display&amp;type=Document&amp;id=3768&amp;source=rss</link>            <guid>http://www.gsdrc.org/go/display&amp;type=Document&amp;id=3768&amp;source=rss</guid>            <category>Voice and accountability</category>            <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>        </item>        <item>            <title>New Media and Democracy in Africa - A Critical Interjection</title>            <author>Fackson Banda, Okoth Fred Mudhai, Wisdom J. Tettey</author>            <description>Has the use of new media improved African political structures, systems and processes? This book chapter introduces studies examining the impact of new information and communication technologies (ICTs) on the societies and politics of African countries. It argues that, a decade after the introduction of ICTs, questions about access, inequality, power and the quality of available information are still valid. The value of new media lies in the extent to which they mesh with old media to provide multimedia platforms that allow for greater democratic participation, inclusion and expression.</description>            <link>http://www.gsdrc.org/go/display&amp;type=Document&amp;id=3766&amp;source=rss</link>            <guid>http://www.gsdrc.org/go/display&amp;type=Document&amp;id=3766&amp;source=rss</guid>            <category>Voice and accountability</category>            <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>        </item>        <item>            <title>Generating Genuine Demand with Social Accountability Mechanisms</title>            <author>Communication for Governance and Accountability Program </author>            <description>What factors contribute to the success or failure of Social Accountability (SA) initiatives? This paper reports on a 2007 workshop organised by the World Bank’s Communication for Governance and Accountability Program. It examines what works in: (1) analysing the public sphere and political context; (2) gaining official support for the use of SA tools; (3) informing citizens; (4) mobilising citizen activism; and (5) achieving behaviour change in public officials through public opinion. </description>            <link>http://www.gsdrc.org/go/display&amp;type=Document&amp;id=3761&amp;source=rss</link>            <guid>http://www.gsdrc.org/go/display&amp;type=Document&amp;id=3761&amp;source=rss</guid>            <category>Voice and accountability</category>            <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>        </item>        <item>            <title>Governance Reform Under Real World Conditions</title>            <author>S Odugbemi and T Jacobson</author>            <description>What are the key challenges for governance reform in complex, diverse sociopolitical and economic conditions? How can these challenges best be addressed? This volume from the World Bank argues that successful, sustained reform requires the alignment of citizens, stakeholders, and voice. Reformers must overcome adaptive challenges such as public opinion, self-interested forces and inertia, and this requires skilled communication. Communication links the constitutive elements of the public sphere – engaged citizenries, vibrant civil societies, plural and independent media systems, and open government institutions – to facilitate the national dialogue which shapes informed public opinion.</description>            <link>http://www.gsdrc.org/go/display&amp;type=Document&amp;id=3758&amp;source=rss</link>            <guid>http://www.gsdrc.org/go/display&amp;type=Document&amp;id=3758&amp;source=rss</guid>            <category>Voice and accountability</category>            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>        </item>        <item>            <title>The Role of Communication in Governance: Detailed Analysis</title>            <author>Coffey International Development</author>            <description>What does available evidence tell us about the role of communication initiatives in government capability, accountability, transparency and responsiveness? This paper from Coffey International Development analyses the positive and negative contributions of communication to governance. In theory, effective communication can help to promote good governance; however, a solid evidence base is lacking and a positive correlation should not be assumed. Existing studies suggest that it is not enough to create the means of communication; enabling factors must be in place so that voices can be heard and citizens can hold government to account.</description>            <link>http://www.gsdrc.org/go/display&amp;type=Document&amp;id=3757&amp;source=rss</link>            <guid>http://www.gsdrc.org/go/display&amp;type=Document&amp;id=3757&amp;source=rss</guid>            <category>Voice and accountability</category>            <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>        </item>        <item>            <title>Strategic Communication for Sustainable Development: A Conceptual Overview</title>            <author>GTZ</author>            <description>What is meant by strategic communication for sustainable development? This GTZ publication outlines how strategic communication can be integrated into development policies and projects. Strategic communication ensures the active solicitation of stakeholders’ perspectives. Despite its impact, communication is rarely integrated in development cooperation programmes as a strategic tool. However, cooperation and collaboration among stakeholders depend on it.</description>            <link>http://www.gsdrc.org/go/display&amp;type=Document&amp;id=3755&amp;source=rss</link>            <guid>http://www.gsdrc.org/go/display&amp;type=Document&amp;id=3755&amp;source=rss</guid>            <category>Voice and accountability</category>            <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2006 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>        </item>        <item>            <title>Participatory Communication: A Practical Guide</title>            <author>Thomas Tufte and Paolo Mefalopulos</author>            <description>How can participatory communication be applied in development projects? This World Bank publication outlines the four key phases of the participatory communication programme cycle. Genuine participatory communication is rare, but it can facilitate the empowerment of marginalised groups and have wider social and political effects. It requires continual dialogue with stakeholders. However, proper application of participatory communication methods are not enough to ensure a project&apos;s success. Broader contextual requirements are important, including a flexible project framework (especially in terms of timelines), a politically conducive environment, and an enabling attitude among key stakeholders. </description>            <link>http://www.gsdrc.org/go/display&amp;type=Document&amp;id=3754&amp;source=rss</link>            <guid>http://www.gsdrc.org/go/display&amp;type=Document&amp;id=3754&amp;source=rss</guid>            <category>Voice and accountability</category>            <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>        </item>        <item>            <title>Transparenting Transparency: Initial Empirics and Policy Applications</title>            <author>Ana Bellver and Daniel Kaufmann</author>            <description>Can access to information and transparency reforms improve governance and development outcomes? How can transparency reforms be empirically measured and effectively implemented? This World Bank paper reviews existing literature and develops and applies a new transparency index for 194 countries. While causality remains difficult to determine, transparency is associated with better socio-economic and human development indicators, and with higher competitiveness and lower corruption. Where there is political will for transparency reform, much progress can be made without excessive resource requirements.</description>            <link>http://www.gsdrc.org/go/display&amp;type=Document&amp;id=3753&amp;source=rss</link>            <guid>http://www.gsdrc.org/go/display&amp;type=Document&amp;id=3753&amp;source=rss</guid>            <category>Voice and accountability</category>            <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2005 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>        </item>        <item>            <title>Enforcement Models: Content and Context</title>            <author>Laura Neuman</author>            <description>Access to information (ATI) rights are only meaningful if they are both enforceable and enforced. What are the different enforcement models for ATI laws, and what determines success? This World Bank paper draws on case studies to consider the three main ATI enforcement models: (1) judicial proceedings; (2) an information commission(er) or appeals tribunal with the power to issue binding orders; and (3) an information commissioner or ombudsman with the power to make recommendations. While there is no &apos;one size fits all&apos; system, principles of independence, accessibility, affordability, timeliness and specialisation are paramount.</description>            <link>http://www.gsdrc.org/go/display&amp;type=Document&amp;id=3752&amp;source=rss</link>            <guid>http://www.gsdrc.org/go/display&amp;type=Document&amp;id=3752&amp;source=rss</guid>            <category>Voice and accountability</category>            <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>        </item>        <item>            <title>Building Political Will for Enhanced Access to Information: Lessons from Latin America</title>            <author>Anabel Cruz</author>            <description>How can citizens’ groups and other stakeholders build political will for the approval and enactment of right to information laws? By analysing experience in Honduras, Nicaragua, Chile and Uruguay, this book chapter from Civicus explores how political will was built to pass access to information laws. It also looks at the challenges of implementation, arguing that the adoption of legislation is merely an important first step. It will mean little if government, encouraged by informed citizens, does not implement the laws.</description>            <link>http://www.gsdrc.org/go/display&amp;type=Document&amp;id=3751&amp;source=rss</link>            <guid>http://www.gsdrc.org/go/display&amp;type=Document&amp;id=3751&amp;source=rss</guid>            <category>Voice and accountability</category>            <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>        </item>        <item>            <title>USAID’s Media Assistance: Policy and Programmatic Lessons</title>            <author>Krishna Kumar</author>            <description>What can be learned from USAID’s media assistance programmes? This USAID paper outlines the results of the agency’s 2002-2003 assessment such programmes. The assessment included workshops and a literature review plus fieldwork in Bosnia, Serbia, Central America and Russia. Key success factors were: (1) a long-term perspective; (2) major resource commitments that facilitated comprehensive, multifaceted, mutually reinforcing interventions; and (3) a context of political transformation that encouraged acceptance of media assistance among political leaders and civil society. Different media development strategies are needed in different types of political system.</description>            <link>http://www.gsdrc.org/go/display&amp;type=Document&amp;id=3750&amp;source=rss</link>            <guid>http://www.gsdrc.org/go/display&amp;type=Document&amp;id=3750&amp;source=rss</guid>            <category>Voice and accountability</category>            <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2004 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>        </item>        <item>            <title>Community Participation in Public Schools: Impact of Information Campaigns in three Indian states</title>            <author>Priyanka Pandey, Sangeeta Goyal, Venkatesh Sundararaman</author>            <description>What impact can community-based information campaigns have on school performance? This article from &lt;i&gt;Education Economics&lt;/i&gt; finds that providing information through a structured campaign has a positive impact on school outcomes. A cluster randomised control trial of 610 villages across three Indian states provided public meetings about community roles and responsibilities in school management. A survey between two and four months later identified positive impacts on process variables such as community participation, provision of student entitlements and teacher effort. Impacts on learning were modest, however, and there were differences between states. Impacts need to be measured over a longer time period.</description>            <link>http://www.gsdrc.org/go/display&amp;type=Document&amp;id=3749&amp;source=rss</link>            <guid>http://www.gsdrc.org/go/display&amp;type=Document&amp;id=3749&amp;source=rss</guid>            <category>Voice and accountability</category>            <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>        </item>        <item>            <title>Assessing the Extent to Which the News Media Act as Watchdogs, Agenda Setters and Gatekeepers</title>            <author>Sina Odugbemi and Pippa Norris</author>            <description>This review from the World Bank&apos;s Communication for Governance and Accountability Program finds that news media are important in furthering democratic governance, provided they are set up in a way that allows them to act as effective watchdogs, agenda setters and gatekeepers. Barriers to the fulfilment of these roles include restrictions on press freedom, market failures, lack of professional standards, weak civil society, and limitations in media literacy and public access to the media. Further research is required to fully determine the relationship between a free media and democratic governance. </description>            <link>http://www.gsdrc.org/go/display&amp;type=Document&amp;id=3748&amp;source=rss</link>            <guid>http://www.gsdrc.org/go/display&amp;type=Document&amp;id=3748&amp;source=rss</guid>            <category>Voice and accountability</category>            <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>        </item>        <item>            <title>On Measuring Governance: Framing Issues for Debate</title>            <author>Daniel Kaufmann and Aart Kraay</author>            <description>How can the measurement of governance be enhanced? This World Bank paper highlights key issues for users and providers of governance indicators. It contends that: (1) all governance indicators have weaknesses; (2) there are no easy solutions in measuring governance; and that (3) the links from governance to development outcomes are complex. Policymakers should view the different types of indicators as complementary rather than competing. </description>            <link>http://www.gsdrc.org/go/display&amp;type=Document&amp;id=3747&amp;source=rss</link>            <guid>http://www.gsdrc.org/go/display&amp;type=Document&amp;id=3747&amp;source=rss</guid>            <category>Voice and accountability</category>            <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>        </item>        <item>            <title>Coalition Building</title>            <author>Communication for Governance and Accountability Program </author>            <description>How can communications strategies contribute to pro-reform coalition building? This briefing from the World Bank&apos;s Communication for Governance and Accountability Program draws on experience from around the world, particularly from Kenya, the Philippines, Georgia and India. It argues that effective coalitions require careful use of communications to foster trust among members while also leveraging diversity – a delicate balancing act. Communications strategies should be sequenced according to each coalition’s particular needs and stage of formation.</description>            <link>http://www.gsdrc.org/go/display&amp;type=Document&amp;id=3746&amp;source=rss</link>            <guid>http://www.gsdrc.org/go/display&amp;type=Document&amp;id=3746&amp;source=rss</guid>            <category>Voice and accountability</category>            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>        </item>        <item>            <title>Dialogues as Communication Strategy in Governance Reform</title>            <author>J. P. Singh</author>            <description>What advantages can dialogue between society and its government offer over one-way communication? This book chapter from the World Bank examines &apos;dialogic communication&apos;, or democratic deliberation, arguing that it offers citizens and public officials an opportunity to come together to find solutions to problems. Dialogic communication may be especially helpful for resource-constrained governments in designing public policy measures that find broad acceptance. Political analysis must guide development actors&apos; use of communication strategies.</description>            <link>http://www.gsdrc.org/go/display&amp;type=Document&amp;id=3745&amp;source=rss</link>            <guid>http://www.gsdrc.org/go/display&amp;type=Document&amp;id=3745&amp;source=rss</guid>            <category>Voice and accountability</category>            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>        </item>    </channel></rss>
