GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»GSDRC Publications»Impact of communication campaigns to deter irregular migration

Impact of communication campaigns to deter irregular migration

Helpdesk Report
  • Evie Browne
July 2015

Question

What is the evidence of the impact of communication campaigns to deter irregular migration from developing to developed countries?

Summary

Understanding the decisions to leave is a key part of the success of communication campaigns to deter irregular migration. However there is very little evidence on the impact and effectiveness of these campaigns and anecdotal evidence suggests that they have limited, if any, effect on migrants’ decisions to leave.

Irregular migration is the movement of people that takes place outside the regulatory norms of the sending, transit and receiving countries (IOM definition), although there is no universally accepted definition. These campaigns generally occur in countries of origin and are not intended to stop migration, but rather to inform of the risks and dangers of irregular routes, smuggling or trafficking (Pécoud, 2010).  Understanding the decisions to leave is therefore a key part of their success.

There is extremely little evidence on the impact and effectiveness of these campaigns, with no publically available evaluations. Even where they are evaluated, attributing reduced migration to a specific programme is difficult. Anecdotal narratives in the literature suggest that information campaigns have very limited effects on migrants’ decisions to leave, as other factors play a more important role in this decision. Conditions of poverty, inequality, conflict and lack of economic opportunities at home, and reports from trusted social networks about conditions abroad, play a much stronger role in migrant decision-making.

This report draws on findings from the following campaigns:

  • IOM/EC AENEAS funded regional project ‘Capacity building, information and awareness raising towards orderly migration in the Western Balkans’
  • Zimbabwe’s Safe Journey Information Campaign project (2005-2010)
  • IOM Kenya project “Horn/Gulf of Aden/Yemen: Improving Protection of Migrants – Phase III” (2012-2013)
  • IOM’s Regional Programme and Dialogue on Facilitating Safe and Legal Migration from South Asia to the EU operated in both South Asia and EU countries.
  • IOM Libya’s Transit and Irregular Migration Management project (TRIM) launched in 2006
  • IOM/Government of Belgium funded project delivered by the Indian Centre for Research in Rural and Industrial Development (CRRID)
  • Cameroon, An IOM video broadcast in Cameroon
  • Ethnographic fieldwork in Senegal examining the management of unauthorised migration in fishing boats from West Africa to the Canary Isles.
file type icon See Full Report [PDF - 444 KB]

Enquirer:

  • DFID

Suggested citation

Browne, E. (2015). Impact of communication campaigns to deter irregular migration (GSDRC Helpdesk Research Report 1248). Birmingham, UK: GSDRC, University of Birmingham.

Related Content

Lessons From Interventions That Address Livelihoods and Cross-border Conflict Systems
Literature Review
2022
Legal Pathways’ Effects on Irregular Migration
Helpdesk Report
2019
Effectiveness of programmes supporting migrants in Africa
Helpdesk Report
2017
Emergency humanitarian response to longer-term development in refugee crises
Helpdesk Report
2017

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2025; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2025; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2025

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".