Democratization and the State
Author: J Grugel
Date: 2002
Size:
22 pages
Access full text: via document delivery
What type of reform is necessary to build a democratic state? Why do a number of developing countries find it difficult to bring about democracy by holding elections? This chapter from Democratization: A Critical Introduction examines the type of institutional reform that democratization should involve. It argues that reforms so far have stopped at the introduction of minimal democracy, and therefore failed to produce fully democratic states. The reasons for this failure include weak state capacity, authoritarian legacies and the imperative of economic reform.
There is general agreement that democratization means more than the introduction of elections, but there is no academic consensus about what reforms, precisely, are required. Democratic states are those governed by the rule of law, through an elected and representative government, with access to decision making for all social groups. Democratization therefore involves institutional, representative and functional change. Currently attention is focused upon institutional changes (the form of the state), rather than transforming who has influence or what the state is responsible for. States tend to resist a deeper democratization.
Changes to visible institutions are not sufficient for a full democratization of the state. Elections and new constitutions do not challenge non-democratic cultures or values.
Institutional change marks the opening of democratization, but there is no evidence that deeper state reform will automatically follow. In some cases, institutional arrangements developed during transition actually hinder deeper democratization. There are a number of obstacles to democratization in post transitional states, which include:
Access full text: via document delivery
Source:
Grugel, J., 2002, ‘Democratization and the State’, chapter 4 in Democratization: A Critical Introduction’, Palgrave, United Kingdom