Unpacking Policy: Actors, Knowledge and Spaces
Author: R McGee
Date: 2004
Size:
26 pages
(10 KB)
Access full text: via document delivery
Debates on political development, governance and globalisation were characterised in the 1990s by increasing challenges to conventional "democracy". Representative democratic systems have many flaws, including the fact that they tend not to be accountable to the poor. To become accountable, policy-making needs to be complemented by participatory aspects. At the same time, there is a growing trend towards the idea of "evidence-based policy". The traditional model of policy-making is a linear, top-down process with two distinct phases - formulation and implementation. Despite having been under attack for 30 years, the linear model is still popular in policy, development and political circles. Constructing replacement models, however, could clarify how the new emphasis on involving poor people in poverty reduction policy processes could work in practice.
What is needed is an alternative understanding of the policy process that highlights both the potential roles played by poor people and the dynamics and relationships negotiated to achieve that end.
If the political systems and the policy processes are to be democratised then so should the knowledge base that feeds those policy processes.
Access full text: via document delivery
Source:
McGee, R., 2004, 'Unpacking Policy: Actors, Knowledge and Spaces' in Brock, K., McGee, R. and Gaventa, J. (eds.) 'Unpacking Policy: Knowledge, Actors and Spaces in Poverty Reduction in Uganda and Nigeria', Fountain Publishers, Kampala
Author:
Institute of Development Studies , http://www.ids.ac.uk