Weak States and Humanitarian Emergencies
Author: R Vayrynen
Date: 2002
Size:
42 pages
Access full text: via document delivery
Are complex humanitarian emergencies the product of impersonal social or natural forces? How do political factors make them worse? This study of the origins of humanitarian emergencies for the Queen Elizabeth House centre for development studies at Oxford University (UK) and the United Nations University (Finland) argues that crises are caused by venal, predatory state characteristics as well as weakness.
It is widely assumed that complex humanitarian emergencies are the products of impersonal forces such as natural disaster, political or economic decay. However, deliberately venal policies of greedy rulers and elites always worsen crisis. Bad rulers almost always govern weak or collapsing states. They are concerned with preserving power and accumulating economic and military assets, not with promoting the common good. Countries affected by crises suffer from arrested economic and intellectual modernisation, polarised social structures, stale and secretive ideological atmospheres, and a lack of democratic institutions and procedures. Case studies from Angola, Columbia, Northern Iraq, Serbia, and Tajikistan show that the most important factors pushing society into crisis are:
Humanitarian crises occur in societies where the state is weak and elites greedy in pursuing their own interest. These two factors reinforce each other, and lead to spiralling crisis. Elites benefit from the continuation of emergencies. It is essential to understand the politics behind the economic factors. The main policy recommendation is that bad rulers should be removed. In addition:
Access full text: via document delivery
Source:
Vayrynen, R., 2002, ‘Weak States and Humanitarian Emergencies’ in eds. Nafziger, E., Stewart, F., and Vayrynen, R., War, Hunger and Displacement: Vol. 2, Oxford University Press, Oxford