Helpdesk

Question
Policy Transfers and Learning: Please identify the literature regarding policy learning and transfer, primarily at international level, but also at national level (particularly where the two are linked). How do such learning and transfers happen, what mechanisms exists, under what conditions does one or the other work, and which types of actors have been key to learning and transfers?

Helpdesk response
Key findings: Actors involved in the policy transfer process can include governments officials, civil servants, pressure groups, policy entrepreneurs and experts, transnational corporations, international, regional and non-governmental organisations, think-thanks, and consultants. Approaches to policy transfer include ‘lesson-drawing’; ‘policy band-wagoning’; ‘emulation’; ‘harmonisation’; and ‘systematically pinching ideas’.

There is an important distinction between voluntary transfer, coercive transfer and policy ‘convergence’ or ‘diffusion’. Voluntary transfer usually occurs when a policy-maker looks to remedy a problem by looking outward for alternative solutions. Coercive transfer on the other hand, occurs when the political actors of a particular state or international organisation impact the policy-making of another country through, for example, aid conditionality. Policy ‘convergence’ or ‘diffusion’ is usually deemed to occur as a result of overarching, structural forces, and imputes a less active role to policy-makers.

Potential pitfalls of policy transfer include:

  • unclear motivations for pursuing policy change
  • uninformed adaptation of the new policy to a foreign environment
  • failure to look beyond what is familiar.

Moreover, there is still limited understanding of what is being achieved by spreading policy ideas and good practice, and consequently, how to maximise benefits from the process.

Full response: http://www.gsdrc.org/docs/open/HD551.pdf



Date query received by the Helpdesk: 05 September 2008

Enquirer's contact details:
DFID China