Adverse Incorporation, Social Exclusion and Chronic Poverty
Author: Sam Hickey, Andries du Toit
Date: 2007
Size:
34 pages
(396)
Access full text: available online
How do the processes of adverse incorporation and social exclusion (AISE) underpin chronic poverty? This paper from the Chronic Poverty Research Centre examines the politics and economy of poverty’s causal processes over time. Challenging AISE involves a shift from policy to politics and from specific anti-poverty interventions to longer-term development strategies. Particular attention should be given to: industrialisation and labour market restructuring; moves towards developmental states; and supporting shifts from clientelism to citizenship.
The contemporary study of poverty has failed to address the underlying causal processes that produce and reproduce poverty over time. AISE research is able to reach across existing analytical boundaries and make links between dimensions and forms of social reality that would otherwise remain obscure. AISE relates especially to the nature and forms of capitalism, different stages and types of state formation and institutionalised patterns of social norms.
Social exclusion and adverse incorporation are often used in overlapping and competing ways. Nevertheless, both concepts have analytical value and can contribute to closer understanding of chronic poverty. The term adverse incorporation is thought to be more appropriate than social inclusion because it captures the ways in which localised livelihood strategies are enabled and constrained by economic, social and political relations over both time and space. These relations are driven by inequalities of power.
The analysis of social exclusion and adverse incorporation shows that citizenship and clientelism are not opposites. Citizenship can involve exclusionary dimensions and elements of clientelism can help the poorest people in the short-term. Further, clientelism and citizenship need to be understood in relation to wider political processes of political representation and competition, state formation and modes of government. Findings also include the following:
AISE and chronic poverty are deeply rooted, and any significant challenge to these inter-related processes will therefore require a political movement – and real social transformation. Despite this and other caveats, however, tentative policy suggestions would be to propose a closer focus on the following areas:
Access full text: available online
Source:
Hickey S. and du Toit, A., 2007, 'Adverse Incorporation, Social Exclusion and Chronic Poverty', Working Paper 81, Chronic Poverty Research Centre, Manchester
Organisation: Chronic Poverty Research Centre, http://www.chronicpoverty.org/