Representation, Citizenship and the Public Domain in Democratic Decentralization
Author: J C Ribot
Date: 2007
Size:
(38 KB)
Access full text: available online
Under what conditions does local democracy emerge? Do local authorities always represent local people? Decentralisation reforms in developing countries have transferred power to a range of local institutions but often failed to empower democratic local governments. This essay from the journal Development looks at how the choice of institutions affects three dimensions of democracy: representation, citizenship and the public domain. While elected local governments are not a substitute for other institutions, they can play an important role in establishing and sustaining local democracy.
Several theories assert that decentralisation is good for democracy, leading to positive efficiency, equity and development outcomes. However, countries and agencies aiming to increase local participation through democratic decentralisation have widely failed to empower democratic local governments. Instead, powers over natural resources are transferred to other institutions such as customary and religious leaders and non-governmental organisations (NGOs). This results in the fragmentation and diffusion of powers among local institutions.
Representation means that leaders are responsive and accountable to the people. Citizenship is a residency-based form of belonging. The public domain represents the political space citizens are able to influence. Decentralisation efforts may affect these three dimensions of democracy in a number of ways:
Some points are particularly relevant to policymakers involved in decentralisation efforts:
Access full text: available online
Source:
Ribot, J. C., 2007, 'Representation, Citizenship and the Public Domain in Democratic Decentralization', Development, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 43-49
Author:
Jesse C. Ribot
, jesser@wri.org